LogFAQs > #977095391

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Fire Emblem Engage not doing so great [Nintendo game sales topic]
Emeraldegg 11/07/23 10:53:33 PM #21:	UshiromiyaEva posted... What I probably want from 4R as far as structure goes, is having sublevels within the level. I don't know the specifics, but basically you've got an overarching map that redeploys with every conquered castle, maybe with some kind of system to recover some HP or, actually preferably, having to swap weakened units out for fresh ones (full roster deployment wouldn't probably not be the case in this scenario). Yes, you do lose the fully open map exploration, but...but yeah that....probably wouldn't fly for most people today! I'm thinking of the one map in PoR that's 4 parts in the forest and each part is just a different part of the forest. You want that but like the whole game --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss <cite>Emeraldegg posted [p:977095391] in Fire Emble... [t:80614307]...</cite> <quote>UshiromiyaEva posted... </cite><quote>What I probably want from 4R as far as structure goes, is having sublevels within the level. I don't know the specifics, but basically you've got an overarching map that redeploys with every conquered castle, maybe with some kind of system to recover some HP or, actually preferably, having to swap weakened units out for fresh ones (full roster deployment wouldn't probably not be the case in this scenario). Yes, you do lose the fully open map exploration, but...but yeah that....probably wouldn't fly for most people today!</quote>I'm thinking of the one map in PoR that's 4 parts in the forest and each part is just a different part of the forest. You want that but like the whole game --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1