LogFAQs > #976957353

wallmasterz posted...

Id be lying if I said I havent come close to moving my vote but that doesnt say anything about my feelings towards you. You have not done anything to undo my first impression.

wallmasterz posted...

In theory I agree with you about not letting a miller claim go unquestioned but the way you went about it felt scummy. For now at least,

##Vote: Dumey

Dumey, what are your impressions so far? Youve been in defense mode since your opening post with good reason. But lets get some thoughts from you beyond just that.

This one, King? We've had a LOT of discussion about traits since then, and I've clarified why I wanted to poke around them a bit more. Knowing what we know about how active traits are explicitly spelled out, but passive traits may not be explicitly spelled out, does that make you curious about Red's confident Miller claim, even though Miller is something that would probably be classified as passive, and not have an explicit "You are guilty to scanners" message associated with it?
Even if you don't agree with the conclusion I eventually came to, is it so odd that knowing that I have a trait I'm confused about whether or not is flavor or passive, does that make sense why I was interested in asking questions of a Miller?

I just feel like we've had SO much conversation about these topics that it's strange that your opinion wouldn't have updated at all so far.