LogFAQs > #976273160

Mackorov posted...

The level of evidence for abiogenesis is about as absurd as the level of evidence for intelligent design. None is better than the other.

Except I already demonstrated how intelligent design is far more absurd. Once again: Abiogenesis says "It's possible that these things we KNOW exist act in this way." Intelligent design says "This thing I made up, and have no evidence for, acted this way."

Mackorov posted...

We need look no further of evidence for intelligent design than ourselves. Go see how DNA is coded in and the core mechanism of genetics. Our cells are literally cities perfectly designed to govern, regulate and replicate themselves.

Such a well-engineered thing is likely no damn result of sheer inorganic randomness.

My two year old son is currently battling leukemia. That means his own blood producing cells have gone hayware and are making fucked up non-functional blood cells by the masses. If not for modern medical science, he would be dead right now, killed by his own cells. Some great "design."

Except as I said, any other possibility has no basis to them at all to begin with, unlike how abiogensis and intelligent design do.

Germs had "no basis" 600 years ago. Also, intelligent design has absolutely nothing to support it except scientific illiteracy and religious indoctrination. Abiogenesis has 1. The existence of matter and energy and 2. Some scientific support in the MillerUrey experiments.