LogFAQs > #973792340

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Black guys try to steal citi bike from white woman
Slayer_22 05/29/23 3:02:06 PM #265:	The_shibe posted... you know what's "funny"? When her culpability is talked about ITT, and in the media, all sorts of proof, cross-time stamping and batman-esque detective techniques need to be used. When her innocence is talked about ITT, and in the media, none of that is needed, it's presumed. It's fucked up The entire incident goes as follows: > She was IMMEDIATELY presumed guilty, without any proof beyond her...being extremely upset, as a pregnant overworked woman. > She had to provide PROOF THAT SHE DID NOTHING WRONG before the masses decided she wasn't in the wrong. This is after she practically lost her job. > NOW, receipts are being provided that say that she's still in the right as a false narrative is spun attempting to say she's, once again, in the wrong when she was in the right. The only presumptions that happened, were that she was guilty without being proven to be so. When people provide proof that they're innocent, they tend to be believed. In this exact situation, and I'm genuinely curious here, what do you believe she should have done? Let them take the bike she paid for, or...? --- "And no I'm not signing your twitter after this type of attitude so don't ask..." - IIINCORRUPTIBLE <cite>Slayer_22 posted [p:973792340] in Black guys... [t:80448946]...</cite> <quote>The_shibe posted... </cite><quote>you know what's "funny"?When her culpability is talked about ITT, and in the media, all sorts of proof, cross-time stamping and batman-esque detective techniques need to be used.When her innocence is talked about ITT, and in the media, none of that is needed, it's presumed. It's fucked up</quote>The entire incident goes as follows:> She was IMMEDIATELY presumed guilty, without any proof beyond her...being extremely upset, as a pregnant overworked woman.> She had to provide PROOF THAT SHE DID NOTHING WRONG before the masses decided she wasn't in the wrong. This is after she practically lost her job.> NOW, receipts are being provided that say that she's still in the right as a false narrative is spun attempting to say she's, once again, in the wrong when she was in the right.The only presumptions that happened, were that she was guilty without being proven to be so. When people provide proof that they're innocent, they tend to be believed.In this exact situation, and I'm genuinely curious here, what do you believe she should have done? Let them take the bike she paid for, or...? --- "And no I'm not signing your twitter after this type of attitude so don't ask..." - IIINCORRUPTIBLE</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1