LogFAQs > #973639797

videospirit posted...

Ok, than next time you can argue that instead of aggressively claiming the receipt proves nothing. Learn to communicate, because you utterly failed to argue the point you're claiming you were.

My communication was just fine. You just can't read and inserted an argument I did not say.

Once again just like in the original post, I specifically addressed a specific action a poster appeared to be implying was a slam dunk that the teens were attempting to steal and intentionally posted it on social media for fake outrage.

The receipt doesn't prove what I specifically addressed. Not my fault you took that and doubled down on something my post doesn't actually talk about.

Your initial reply outright ignored what my post specifically addressed to go argue something my post does not address. Them weaponize public opinion is not a smoking gun they knew they were in the wrong about the bike. People who are in the right weaponize public opinion all the time. Weaponization of public opinion is not a smoking gun argument to any implied argument that the teenagers were faking in thinking it was their bike.