LogFAQs > #973029746

Ozmose posted...

First off, lets address some errors.

There were no "errors". You completely missed my point. I'm fully aware that some of the examples I'd listed have already been banned, been up for consideration for being banned, or had already been through the courts. That wasn't my point.

The point I was making is that while certain "features" or accessories have been the target of regulation and restriction, only the fringe extreme has called for an outright ban on firearms and/or repeal of the 2nd, while most 2A defenders resist even moderate regulation.

It's utter nonsense that there are no concessions because "the other side isn't willing." There are no viable solutions coming from 2A defenders. And they refuse to sit down at the table to even begin to entertain discussing a solution that proposes regulations.

The only ideas that come from 2A defenders are half-baked, non-starter "solutions", at best. Nebulous, undefined things like "address mental health" with no guideline or plan to achieve that. "Arm the teachers!", which is laughable. If anyone who suggested arming teachers ever met with or spoke with any teachers, they'd realize the vast majority want very little to do with guns, let alone with bringing them into the schools.