LogFAQs > #972198227

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	We got the bastard! They caught him red handed!!!
SKARDAVNELNATE 03/15/23 7:56:56 PM #33:	adjl posted... That's not a position on whether or not there's reason to infer homophobic intent from these incidents That's not what we're arguing over. That was never what we were arguing over. However, did you already forget when I did relate those points? Whatever the news outlets say I take as proof as the opposite. Therefore, if they say there was intent that is proof that there wasn't. adjl posted... Sure, you state it an awful lot, but you've put forth exactly zero effort to actually defend it It's an opinion. I defend have to defend shit. This the age when subjective opinions are more important than objective facts. adjl posted... it means justifying it and making a real effort to logically convince others that it's worth holding. Do I even have to? If you've been paying attention at all it should be self evident. They lied about Covington. They Lied about Rittenhouse. They lied about the impeachment. They lied about bleach. They lied about fish tank cleaner. They lied about horse paste. They lied about the vaccine. They lied about the laptop. They lied about J6. adjl posted... That news outlets are reporting on it is entirely ancillary to the joke. News outlets blowing things out of proportion is the joke. The LGBTQ flag being involved is entirely ancillary. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:972198227] in We got the... [t:80377561]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite><quote>That's not a position on whether or not there's reason to infer homophobic intent from these incidents</quote>That's not what we're arguing over. That was never what we were arguing over. However, did you already forget when I did relate those points? Whatever the news outlets say I take as proof as the opposite. Therefore, if they say there was intent that is proof that there wasn't.adjl posted... </cite><quote>Sure, you state it an awful lot, but you've put forth exactly zero effort to actually defend it</quote>It's an opinion. I defend have to defend shit. This the age when subjective opinions are more important than objective facts.adjl posted... </cite><quote>it means justifying it and making a real effort to logically convince others that it's worth holding.</quote>Do I even have to? If you've been paying attention at all it should be self evident. They lied about Covington. They Lied about Rittenhouse. They lied about the impeachment. They lied about bleach. They lied about fish tank cleaner. They lied about horse paste. They lied about the vaccine. They lied about the laptop. They lied about J6.adjl posted... </cite><quote>That news outlets are reporting on it is entirely ancillary to the joke.</quote>News outlets blowing things out of proportion is the joke. The LGBTQ flag being involved is entirely ancillary. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1