LogFAQs > #972156681

chelle posted...

you tend to always try and argue disingenuously about these things.

Let's talk about disingenuous arguments.

From the article...

Nobody is stopping them for living their life, and they shouldnt stop someone else,

They didn't stop anyone from living their life. They're kids on bikes. They didn't effect the life of anyone.

Why would somebody make the effort to scuff up somebodys elses life?

It's a painting on a street, not somebody's life.

We will not tolerate those people who try to exhibit hate in our community.

Kids would do that regardless of what colorful thing is painted there. Do they even know what it's suppose to represent? Yet this quote is treating it like it's an intentional hate crime to leave skid marks in a street.

Out of fairness I'll make the opposite argument.
Maybe those kids know exactly what it represents. Given how often they change it maybe those kids think that outdated version is too exclusionary. They want the variant with the purple circle and the umbrella painted there and they'll keep skidding their bicycles until they get it.

But I'd rather not assume anything.