LogFAQs > #972066096

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicStar Trek Mafia - Topic 6: I'm a co-host, not a doctor
Chaeix
03/09/23 5:41:55 PM
#70:


Crescent-Moon posted...
Just by setup meta, it essentially means there's zero chance scum has an EK of any sort, and likely means they have no unblockable kill. His flip alone was why any theory that involved scum possibly shooting twice last night was nonsense.
Hm this is an interesting thought, and actually makes sense.

Re: Sheep I've been taking a look back through Topic 2 where Chris and Sheep had a few exchanges: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/80370531?page=2

SirChris posted...
Anyway now that we've discussed Sheep a lot, and we can just murder him later if we want since vanilla claims are nice safety valves (hint sheep get your head on straight if you are town please)

This comment strikes me as a little strange, especially given that I went back and looked and Chris honestly didn't really talk about Sheep that much until after that post? But after he did have a fairly comprehensive reply to Ctes about Sheep that provided some insight (Post 146), but I'm not sure it reads well for Sheep:

SirChris posted...
I think for the perspective of scum sheep botched this to be valid it would indicate that I really put the screws to him and managed to disrupt his game to the point where he panicked.

If Chris knew that Sheep was in fact a town vanilla, would Chris throw out this soft defense? I feel like scum would keep the possibility of scum Sheep more in the limelight if he knew Sheep was a lowly vanilla and easy mislynch target. This oozes a soft defense and redirection tbh. It's hard to speculate because Chris' brain is running a game of 4D chess at all times though.

---
we're all buds~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1