LogFAQs > #972011849

There's a fair bit I'd like to respond to, but my morning at work is very busy, so it may come in a bit piecemeal. Be patient with me if it seems like I haven't gotten to you yet.

htaeD posted...

Why does it look like you havent read my posts at all, EDumey? But rather only read what JC said about me. (and not even correctly at that)

Heck some could say that you are doing a lot of pinging people for questions yourself.
I know thats not all you did. You at least worded some decent arguments about JC and his list that I do agree with. But I am wondering when the information gathering of yours will pay off.

I'm not sure what is going on this game with people either feeling misrepresented in their activity level, or gaslighting about their activity level. Ulti before claimed that he thinks he has posted more than anyone else in the game which is just patently false. You (Death) were late to the game, and then because of timezone shenanigans have not been as active. There were multiple people, not just JC or me, that pointed out you were not posting to your usual level, which IIRC is why the current votes on you manifested. I understand from your perspective that you want to say you've posted as best you can, but if I were to ISO you later today, would you really stand by the idea that you've mostly been quieter, not interjecting as much as usual on "voice of reason" topics (mostly because you haven't been around for them, and have been mostly pinging for questions? I really don't even think that's an unfair assessment. You even started by making an excuse for your lower activity because Mondays are rough, which I was willing to give you sympathetically last night! It's not scummy to have an unproductive Monday. It is slightly scummy to then come in and try to say people who called you out on it are misrepresenting you.

Now I do NOT have the time do that ISO right now, but if you feel strongly about this contention, I will try to make some time to do it during my lunch hour later today.