LogFAQs > #972008795

Dumey's first post on Sheep

EDumey posted...

If I am to add an actual non-shit post opinion, I will say that the only person I do have an odd feeling about is indeed Sheep! Sorry Sheep, betraying the only one that tied to buddy up so far is mean spirited. But the combination of Sheep's first post making a special player appeal to BCT, calling me a buddy, and then offering a same-time claim was three quick "hmmm..."s for me. I'm not really sure I see the purpose of a same-time claim early D1 unless you think there's some kind of contradiction to be caught?

Someone extremely handsome calls this noncommittal, to which he responds:

EDumey posted...

I feel like I could levy this exact same criticism at you here though. You caught up with start of day and my post is the only one you make any sort of real comment on? Could definitely be seen as "I guess I have to comment on SOMETHING" energy.

But rather than engage in a "no u" spat, do you think my take on Sheep is wrong? I would define odd here as "points toward scum side of the scale, but not enough evidence to make a firm decision." and I listed three early interactions that moved Sheep on that scale.

"points toward scum side of the scale, but not enough evidence to make a firm decision" sticks out here. Still not a very firm read, but the next time he mentions Sheep is when he votes him. There's never a whole lot of conviction behind the Sheep read from what I can see, but he was willing to pressure him which I think was a fine play, but it is suspicious that he's taking a more passive approach when the wagon hasn't been started yet, whereas the Sheep wagon was already rolling.