LogFAQs > #968733764

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicArkham Knights locked at 30 FPS on consoles
EatTideGoats
10/15/22 2:06:41 PM
#41:


Atralis posted...
This is such a fucking stupid metric that is mostly used by console kiddies that don't know what the fuck they are talking about. If you are trashing consoles for this as a "PC gamer" you aren't actually a pc gamer or else you would actually have fiddled with graphical settings on your own and tried to reach the best performance to fps ratio at some point and realized that 30 vs 60 doesn't fucking matter for a lot of games.

All this means is this that they are targeting 30 fps as the fps they want to meet for a SINGLE PLAYER console game. There isn't anything wrong with that.

Seriously I'm calling out every "pc master race" gamer in this topic talking shit about this. You aren't a real pc gamer. You are fucking lying. You have never owned a gaming pc. You have never built a pc. You don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

ALL OF YOU. Come at me. Say something. Pretend that you aren't so full of shit that its spilling out your ears and nose.

I've built multiple PCs to the point that I consider it a hobby and know extensively about what it takes to run games at certain qualities and frame rates.

Your take is dog shit. 30FPS is good for a retro game you want to emulate, but in the modern age with finer details and higher resolutions, 30FPS looks choppy. There's a reason 60FPS is the gold standard and nobody ever sold a 2K/4K 30hz monitor.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1