LogFAQs > #966377410

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Cops when you ask why you are pulled over before giving your id
WingsOfGood 07/06/22 11:04:25 AM #93:	Tyranthraxus posted... You have not explained why cherry picking is an invalid stance to hold when it comes to resisting laws you disagree with. I didn't have to. The user who provided the principle felt that they could not apply the principle to abortion. Why? Because it spoke for itself. He only wants to apply the principle to certain laws he feels he or his friends can easily comply with. But yet the principle was still given universally. The thing is there is more scenarios that we can apply and find the same conclusion. That you do not comply just because they are laws. Therefore we find the principle is useless and using it to say "hey we can use it for this 1 or 2 laws" is dumb thing to say. Not only that, but even doing it for those 1 or 2 laws does not work for many people. <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:966377410] in Cops when ... [t:80083689]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote> You have not explained why cherry picking is an invalid stance to hold when it comes to resisting laws you disagree with.</quote> I didn't have to. The user who provided the principle felt that they could not apply the principle to abortion. Why? Because it spoke for itself. He only wants to apply the principle to certain laws he feels he or his friends can easily comply with. But yet the principle was still given universally. The thing is there is more scenarios that we can apply and find the same conclusion. That you do not comply just because they are laws. Therefore we find the principle is useless and using it to say "hey we can use it for this 1 or 2 laws" is dumb thing to say. Not only that, but even doing it for those 1 or 2 laws does not work for many people. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1