LogFAQs > #966049439

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSupreme Court Strikes down Conceal and Carry Law Bans...
adjl
06/23/22 5:23:39 PM
#34:


Veedrock- posted...
Y'all really won't like that comparison but it's valid.

How many people are injured or killed by voting each year?

Veedrock- posted...
I find it especially hypocritical that people are saying SCOTUS shouldn't overturn a decades old ruling because precedent, but believe they should overturn a centuries old amendment because times change.

It's quite easily demonstrable that times have changed in ways that necessitate updates to the second amendment (namely advances in gun technology, which are pretty obvious). Can you demonstrate that times have changed such that banning abortion no longer infringes upon the bodily autonomy of women (which would be the basis for overruling Roe v. Wade due to the changing of times)?

It only seems hypocritical if you consider nothing below the most basic, surface-level analysis you can possibly perform on those two issues. Think about it at all (which is generally a good idea when dealing with serious issues with tremendous impact on society), and that accusation falls apart pretty much immediately.

---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1