LogFAQs > #965807830

changmas posted...

a jury that wasn't sequestered and had full access to be biased by the internet's reaction to the trial. lmao.

Yes, it was the biased internet.

Not the repeated lies. Not the outrageous stories that were impossible. Not the audio of her admitting to abusing him and admitting he tries to escape from conflicts. Not the fact that her experts were hot trash that fell apart on every cross examination.

It was the internet.

And even if you want want to claim "they saw the internet reaction and made their decision because of that", Amber's team REPEATEDLY cited to the internet by showing the overwhelming support Johnny had, in trial, to the point that the jury was aware Amber Turd was a thing, and that Amber told them more than once to look at how nobody believes her on the internet.

So if you want to say "The jury was looking stuff up on the internet" then it was Amber's fault they actually did so, because she tried to weaponize it for pity. And then, you need to assume that the jury saw people making TikTok memes and decided it was accurate to what they were watching through every day of the trial.

Like this is dopey logic for dopey people.