LogFAQs > #965462399

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJohnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial 2
PrivateBiscuit1
06/01/22 4:30:22 PM
#299:


HeroDelTiempo17 posted...
I just have a really hard time believing this, Depp won his suit because he meticulously documented a ton of shit and had better lawyers, and he's in a pretty unique position to come forward as a well liked public figure. How applicable is that to most abuse victims?

The only ways I see this case moving the needle is on the public reaction, and frankly I think the memification of it has been insufferably bad in a way that's only gonna have bad effects.
Excuse me? Depp didn't meticulously document anything.

Amber was the one with meticulous documentation of staged photos and made up stories that she tried to fit conveniently in timelines where she claimed there were no witnesses. And she LIED.

Johnny just reacted in kind based on photos that existed through paparazzi. Amber lost because she had bad facts, not bad lawyers. Even if there was no Elaine, they still would have had a hard time winning.

Depp's team was great, absolutely. But to act like it wasn't an uphill climb to get to this verdict is nonsense given how hard defamation cases are to prove.

---
I stream sometimes. Check it out!
www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1