| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Republican Supreme Court:Evidence of innocence not enough to overturn conviction |
| darkmaian23 05/28/22 3:30:34 AM #15: | gunplagirl posted... Well jeez you guys I'm starting to think that maybe using floating interpretations of hundreds of year old documents isn't the best basis for a government since all you need to do to undermine it is control the people who do the interpreting.That would be a problem for the present US government no matter what. The people who have power and money have decided what they want done, and they'll say or do whatever it takes to make it happen.Have you seen portions of the leaked Roe v. Wade draft? It's completely unhinged. Although he didn't say it directly, Clarence Thomas' answer to public outcry against the leaked draft was basically "we are the elite and we rule the way we want; you peasants must accept what we do because those are the rules". It's not a problem with the Constitution---it doesn't matter what the facts say or what legal scholarship says, they'll rule however they like and make up any justification for it. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |