LogFAQs > #965334380

charmander6000 posted...

There might be someone that may argue that it wasn't beyond reasonable doubt even though this isn't a criminal case.

Nope. The jury instructions will be VERY clear about this that it's a preponderance of evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt. To put it simply, they have to believe there is a 50+1% chance that Amber is lying. The jury instructions will absolutely reflect that.

TheRock1525 posted...

I think Virginia is also a state where civil cases do require unanimous consensus among the jurors. I could be wrong though.

This is right. Unanimous consensus needs to be here, but I just don't see a group of jurors spending 6 weeks doing this trial and not coming out with a unanimous decision. Most of the jurors clearly don't believe anything Amber is saying. And if those few people are leaning on Amber's side, how hard are you going to argue against the people who are just reminding you of every single thing Amber said that's a clear lie? What do you say to defend it? There's no way that anyone likes Amber Heard enough after all of that to argue vehemently with a group of people that she's innocent.