LogFAQs > #965273375

BlAcK TuRtLe posted...

Curious to see the full story behind this. This screams to me like one of those situations where the media pushes a narrative (likely paid for by some "legal rights fund") that just straight up omits key details to drum up support from the ignorant masses. "Making of a Murderer" being the most obvious and egregious example

There isn't one. The majority decided this purely as a legal question of whether/when the federal courts can reverse a state conviction. They essentially said the facts don't matter and should never have been considered by the lower federal courts in the first place since the state courts already decided that.