LogFAQs > #965176854

Elaine is 100% not losing her license over anything in this trial. Even if she was out of line, there was no violation made. Ben Chew just treated it all as a joke, even saying stuff like "Nice try, but I would advise..." and "That was clever, but I would advise..." It's just a lawyer trying to do what she could with shitty facts to try and prove a counter-claim that frankly should have been dismissed because it even got to court.

The thing with Amber Heard's counter-claim was that she initially alleged 50 cases of defamation from Johnny Depp. Before it got to court, it was reduced to the three statements Adam Waldman made that Amber is claiming Johnny Depp made him say. We still have another day for her to prove Adam Waldman said something speaking for Johnny there, but I sincerely doubt they have anything.

I think they wanted it in there to present that Adam Waldman was hiding something to the jury, whereas the jury has seen nothing but Elaine trying to get things out of people she's not allowed to with repeated objections, whereas the jury seems like they respect and like Ben Chew and trust him. And all of them checked out entirely while Elaine was getting stonewalled there for like half an hour.

But Amber would have been better off if it was dismissed outright so she could claim it was unfair, etc. and then they wouldn't have had to put on this witness who just blew up her case.