LogFAQs > #965170181

The last one here is a woman with a name so complicated I won't attempt it, but she was Amber Heard's talent agent. She repeatedly said Aquaman was "the most successful movie of all time ever" which... I'm pretty sure it's actually not? Like it did amazing thanks to China, but I don't thnk it was the most successful?

This woman did absolutely nothing for Amber. She outright said that the reason Warner Bros. gave her for why they were going to re-cast her in Aquaman 2 was because her and Jason Mamoa had no chemistry. Not because of anything that had come out in the news. They said this specifically. So what the fuck, her counter-claim is worthless.

Now, this could be a lie, but it's the reason they gave anyway. Maybe they didn't have chemistry, I assume because Jason Mamoa just seems like he doesn't like Amber, and Amber had told a story about how he supposedly ripped up a page of a book she was reading on set once a day. Amber doesn't seem like she's all too great to have on a set due to her attitude. Her acting was also widely panned in reviews of the movie that were otherwise mostly positive. Whatever reason you think may be the truth, it doesn't really matter. They have Warner Bros. officially stating it was a reason other than any drama that spurned from Adam Waldman's article, so it's over.

But she said that Amber did lose the Aquaman 2 role and also her DC movie contract. So she's acting in this movie without the DC movie contract at all. They didn't get into it here, but the reason Amber got her role back was because she threatened litigation regarding her lawyer looking at the contract and finding that they couldn't just release her from the movie. This was a compromise.

The agent also stated that Amber's career was on the upswing after Aquaman, and then it suddenly wasn't and nobody wanted to work with her. She said she got ripped from roles, specifically citing some Amazon Prime movie, and stated that it was because of the negativity she was receiving online. But she stated that nobody can just come out and say that's the reason. So that's all speculation. But she's saying this while they're arguing that people absolutely can and should be saying why Johnny Depp definitively has lost his Pirates 6 role. Do they even realize they're just helping Johnny's argument too with this?

There was so much speculation from this woman about why people didn't want to hire Amber, how much money she would have made, thinking that most people posting negativity about Amber were bots (citing that she clicked on them and she could tell). Loooooots of speculation.

But the only other notable part was when she said, in defense of Amber, that nobody wants someone accused of abuse working on their movie. Gee, you mean like how Amber did to Johnny? Like holy hell, this just helps bolster Johnny's argument.

So basically, the counter-claim was dead when Adam Waldman testified. But now it's super dead because she was outright given a reason for her initially losing her role in Aquaman 2. After Amber's case in chief is over, Johnny's team will move to dismiss the counter-claim and I would be shocked if it's not dismissed. There's just nothing here proving anything Waldman said in that one article was the reason she lost a single role.

Just a horrific day for Amber. Yesterday was a mild positive for her before, but today was just one hit after another--and they were all her own witnesses too. They should have just dropped the counter-claim and said fuck it and not included some of these witnesses, but that's Amber's choice to drop it. Filing it in the first place was an even bigger mistake.

But you know the most devastating thing about today? How much time each team has left to present their case.

Johnny: 18h 30m
Amber: 8h 14m

Amber's team spent all of this time with these useless witnesses that didn't help her case at all. Just look at that disparity between both of them. Amber has maybe one more day of her case left on Monday to present, which will probably eat up at least 5 hours of her time. She has no more important witnesses left. I don't know who she plans to use, but I feel like she's still going to spend most of the day. So that means that Johnny will have all of these rebuttal witnesses for the next week, and they have plenty of time to use them.

So now Amber's team has to decide how to use what little time she has. Will she just abandon a couple of her remaining witnesses to have more time for rebuttal? How much time will she use doing cross on certain Depp witnesses? Johnny's team can just save their most valuable witnesses for last and let Amber's team eat away time, and probably have none left by the end to cross examine them.

And in a final bit of news, the jurors will have access to every video and audio file that's been played in court while they deliberate. Which, you know, is good because any audio file in full with context makes Amber look horrible every time.

I think I'm more confident than ever that Johnny wins this case. Amber's case isn't over, but after today it might as well be. Putting together this miserable show along with hearing about jury reactions to Amber's case today (being not really paying any attention for the most part), I think their minds are mostly made up now. It's a long trial, so it's understandable.

One week left!