LogFAQs > #965154231

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJohnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial 2
PrivateBiscuit1
05/19/22 1:23:39 PM
#70:


Adam Waldman was put on here for Amber's case, and he needed to be because he's the one they were counter-suing over the statement he made in Rolling Stone about this being a hoax, claiming he was speaking on behalf of Johnny. Elaine who is awful kept getting stone-walled by attorney client privilege and then Rottenborn came up here and asked him questions in which the LAPD was looking into perjury for things Amber said and the man dead ass named 27 people who all offered a statement that Amber didn't have any marks on her in the days leading to her getting a restraining order, including her dopey friends we have seen testified.

If I had to guess, they will move to dismiss the counter-claim and I think it will be granted, because they have offered no proof that Adam Waldman made these statements on behalf of Johnny or by instruction from Johnny.

But they had to put him on to even have a shot at getting the counter-claim forward but he just absolutely devastated their case. I'm legitimately shocked because oh my god he destroyed them and pointed out that all of their credibility is shot.

---
I stream sometimes. Check it out!
www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1