LogFAQs > #965094093

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJohnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
Axl_Rose_85
05/17/22 1:31:58 AM
#453:


PrivateBiscuit1 posted...
Oh, another thing worth mentioning is that we all said we weren't sure if the thing about Amber Heard's screen time in Aquaman 2 being reduced was true or not, but Amber confirmed she got a smaller part, and that small part kept getting reduced to the point where she's barely in it.

That's not good enough. They pulled a double standard with Johnny Depp being removed from Fantastic Beasts. Yet decided not to do so when Heard was accused with the same allegations. Why? Because she is a woman? Heard being replaced by say Emilia Clarke or someone else would been for the best. They wouldn't have had to minimize the Mera scenes and that character would have been redeemed by not being portrayed by an abuser. But who am I kidding, there's a good chance Heard could be lying or grossly over exaggerating all that she said about her role in Aquaman 2.

Regardless, as long as this vile dumpster fire of a human being is on it, I am not touching Aquaman 2 with a ten foot pole and boycotting any future company that hires her for any sort of work after this debacle.

... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1