LogFAQs > #965075869

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
ChaosTonyV4 05/16/22 12:09:18 PM #419:	PrivateBiscuit1 posted... Sorry, I should have been more clear. I meant that she wasn't allowed to speak with her attorneys about her testimony, during her testimony (which extends to the break). For instance, Johnny also wasn't allowed to talk to his attorneys about his testimony during the weekend break in the middle of his testimony too. But it's clear that they had discussed it because they went back to make "corrections" and then "clarify" things. Tbh thats a stupid rule and not consistent between states. Unless the break occurs mid-question, theres no reason a client shouldnt be able to talk to their lawyer. --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado <cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted [p:965075869] in Johnny Dep... [t:79993106]...</cite> <quote>PrivateBiscuit1 posted... </cite> <quote>Sorry, I should have been more clear. I meant that she wasn't allowed to speak with her attorneys about her testimony, during her testimony (which extends to the break). For instance, Johnny also wasn't allowed to talk to his attorneys about his testimony during the weekend break in the middle of his testimony too. But it's clear that they had discussed it because they went back to make "corrections" and then "clarify" things.</quote> Tbh thats a stupid rule and not consistent between states. Unless the break occurs mid-question, theres no reason a client shouldnt be able to talk to their lawyer. --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1