LogFAQs > #965045233

GuessMyUserName posted...

3 of which I figure are controversial (Politics Containment 86 in April 2017, a Corrik topic in October 2017, and a Corrik topic in August 2018)... maybe possibly another one about relationship advice labeled [blogfaqs] in August 2019

so I'm going to round a little bit in my favor here but, including this topic, that's 4 times in the last 5 years. I'm someone who only posts in a big topic like this once, maybe twice each year. as I said, if you put money on him as one of the candidates to be arguing against me, you'd probably come out ahead.

also keep in mind that any of these 2017 and later topics are AFTER I returned to board 8. before that, I had left for years because of people doing the same thing. it was arguably even worse before I left the board. this has a very long history of happening, and no amount of foolmo trying to gaslight is going to change history.

not sure if GMUN is trying to downplay this or admitting that it is true, but you pretty much just posted evidence that yes, my memory of SEP being among the people ganging up on me in previous topics was in fact accurate. going back years.

StealThisSheen posted...

and it seems mostly civil? We disagreed, but it never got to anything even resembling personal attacks, that I can see.

the issue isn't personal attacks, the issue is 5, 10, or more people constantly attacking me in every single topic. and it's always the same people.

furthermore, did I address you first? or did you quote one of my posts and pile on with like 6 other people who were already trying to argue with me about a shit ton of pedantic nonsense. it's annoying, it's topic derailing, and it always happens. and I am NEVER the one who instigates it.

it's always people quoting me, and addressing me first. my interaction with you in this topic is a very, very rare exception in that while I technically did address you first, it was because you responded to someone that was essentially just agreeing with my post.

StealThisSheen posted...

For what it's worth, after reading it more, what I apologized for in the gun reform topic was you bringing up a topic where you posted data before and said people ignored it or something then demanded the same data in a later topic, and I said I didn't remember being in such a topic but apologized if I was, and then you said you honestly couldn't even remember if I was in it or not, you were just referencing things that happened, and then the "I don't care much for apologies" bit. That was about as heated as it got.

this does sound accurate, yes. I remember having a conversation along those lines which is why it's especially annoying when you, again, later claim that you think we have no history of arguing with each other. so like... obviously you were wrong this time. you say it didn't happen, say that I am confusing you for someone else; when we look back, we see the evidence that it did actually happen. so was it the same in that topic? were you actually in the previous gun control topic as well?