LogFAQs > #964995098

adjl posted...

Not really. The only opinions that get censored get censored on the basis of being terrible opinions that nobody should have, not on the basis of their political leanings (e.g. you getting warned for insisting that the Covid vaccines were dangerous and there's a grand conspiracy to cover that up: that's not a "right-wing opinion," that's just plain dangerous misinformation). It turns out that a lot of such deplorable opinions are associated with the right wing, but that's largely coincidental.

Vaccine doesn't stop you from getting it, doesn't stop you from spreading it, so why are they running on a narrative of getting vaccinated to protect others? clearly only those who are considered at risk should need it "if" it reduces symptom severity. 0.1% death rate in under 60's over 75% of those 0.1% had chronic pre-existing conditions (Aus stats), billionaires experience record wealth growth while middle class experiences record losses, 2012 death per thousand people all cause mortality 7.743, 2021 in the middle of the "Worst" pandemic in 100 years all cause mortality 7.645.

There are 101 reasons to be asking questions, the shady history of pfizer, moderna and J&J only compound people's distrust further, transparency is key to trust and here pfizer is trying to hide all it's data for 75 years so the people affected are fucking dead before they can learn the truth, why would they do that?