LogFAQs > #964750038

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
CoolCly 05/03/22 2:09:12 AM #264:	PrivateBiscuit1 posted... They were very successful at controlling the narrative because the UK trial wasn't televised. Now, it's all televised and everyone can more readily hear about everything Johnny says happened and then compare it to Amber's previous stories in which she's just lied about everything pretty clearly. It's New York Post, which is kind of a rag, but a few other sources seem to have confirmed this too. It wouldn't shock me since a "source" (Eve Barlow) living with Amber during the trial recently informed them of her routine that included studying for trial (which is weird because why does she need to study if she's just going to talk about what happened?) and then trying to villainize Johnny because the "source" said that Amber feels dehumanized because her ex-husband (who she claims abused her on the daily) is ignoring her in court. It wouldn't surprise me though. I just think the genie is out of the bottle and I think her testimony, which is probably on Wednesday, is just going to open up even more criticism. well it straight up says who the replacement firm is... PrivateBiscuit1 posted... (which is weird because why does she need to study if she's just going to talk about what happened?) this is the kind of really weird comment that shows how biased you are btw like, its the most normal thing in the world to rehearse the incredibly specific phrasing you need to give in your statement so you don't start rambling, and say something slightly vague or that can be interpreted differently from your prior statements, and to prepare for all the questions you are going to be asked your commentary attempts to give off this impression that you have good amount of knowledge of how court proceedings work and what the "norms" are, so you can point out when something is "weird", but if you really had any familiarity with these processes, that comment would never cross your mind. you only say it because its just another snipe at her, not because it makes any sense. studying for testimony the most normal thing imaginable for someone in her position to do --- The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG <cite>CoolCly posted [p:964750038] in Johnny Dep... [t:79993106]...</cite> <quote>PrivateBiscuit1 posted... </cite> <quote>They were very successful at controlling the narrative because the UK trial wasn't televised. Now, it's all televised and everyone can more readily hear about everything Johnny says happened and then compare it to Amber's previous stories in which she's just lied about everything pretty clearly. It's New York Post, which is kind of a rag, but a few other sources seem to have confirmed this too. It wouldn't shock me since a "source" (Eve Barlow) living with Amber during the trial recently informed them of her routine that included studying for trial (which is weird because why does she need to study if she's just going to talk about what happened?) and then trying to villainize Johnny because the "source" said that Amber feels dehumanized because her ex-husband (who she claims abused her on the daily) is ignoring her in court. It wouldn't surprise me though. I just think the genie is out of the bottle and I think her testimony, which is probably on Wednesday, is just going to open up even more criticism.</quote> well it straight up says who the replacement firm is... PrivateBiscuit1 posted... </cite> <quote>(which is weird because why does she need to study if she's just going to talk about what happened?)</quote> this is the kind of really weird comment that shows how biased you are btw like, its the most normal thing in the world to rehearse the incredibly specific phrasing you need to give in your statement so you don't start rambling, and say something slightly vague or that can be interpreted differently from your prior statements, and to prepare for all the questions you are going to be asked your commentary attempts to give off this impression that you have good amount of knowledge of how court proceedings work and what the "norms" are, so you can point out when something is "weird", but if you really had any familiarity with these processes, that comment would never cross your mind. you only say it because its just another snipe at her, not because it makes any sense. studying for testimony the most normal thing imaginable for someone in her position to do --- The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1