LogFAQs > #964745214

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSupreme Court voted to overturn Abortion Rights
streamofthesky
05/02/22 10:04:10 PM
#23:


There will definitely be some bitter irony in that it was the stubbornness of two of the most prominent Democratic women in politics that enabled this*.
Hillary Clinton, probably the only person so disliked that they would've lost to Trump, ran anyway because it was her turn.
And Ruth Bader Ginsberg, deciding the destruction of Roe v. Wade was #Worth_It! for another few years on the bench instead of retiring.

Anyway, gentle reminder to all of you doing a victory dance who think this somehow will "protect life", that abortions happened before Roe v. Wade and will continue afterwards. If someone really doesn't want a kid, they'll do what they have to (but, the same people push abstinence only education, so I guess the concept that you can't force your morality on others eludes them).
Roe v. Wade just made the safe medical abortion legal. Now people who don't want kids will just be going back to the "home remedies". I suppose this is a "buying opportunity" for stock in wire hanger companies...

* "This" being the destruction of women's bodily autonomy by Republicans. Because yes, while the above two enabled it, they're the ones that actually did it and are at fault.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1