LogFAQs > #964527271

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJohnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
TheRock1525
04/24/22 5:23:03 AM
#130:


So from what I understand, Bredehoft didn't actually mention Milani by name and that the makeup kit she showed could have just been an example of what she could have been using at the time. She says "this is what she was carrying in her purse with the entire relationship with Johnny Depp." Which means she could very specifically mean that particular brand and everything, but it could also be that the brand she was using previously either no longer exists or she doesn't have any of it left over, or it's just a visual of what type of makeup Amber would keep in her purse. I think the larger point the lawyer was getting at is that she was using makeup in general for covering up bruises, and if that particular brand didn't exist in 2012-2016, it doesn't really matter because obviously some version of a correcting kit would exist.

Not to mention, Glamour was already reviewing the product in 2016 along with it's available price, meaning Milani is being dishonest about when this product hit shelves.

---
TheRock ~ I had a name, my father called me Blues.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1