LogFAQs > #962182727

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhy do 90% of pro-capitalism arguments
g980
01/29/22 2:33:19 PM
#144:


RchHomieQuanChi posted...


Except nobody argued that.

Squall said that hunter-gatherers worked more for food and there's been research to suggest that that isn't true. Actual quality of life is a whole different discussion.

What you're doing right now is arguing in bad faith, considering how often you seem to misinterpret arguments. Thanks for proving my point tho


You posted it in response to this:Squall28 posted...
But this guy makes an argument that tribesmen have food and clothes so they are rich. Somehow people who need to hunt animals to eat and skin them for clothes are better off than living in a society where you can do less hours of work and get better quality food, shelter, and clothes.


If its intended as a counterpoint then you are absolutely implying that they were better off. If not, then why bother post it?

---
These old bones live to learn her wanton ways:
(I measure time by how a body sways).
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1