LogFAQs > #961806119

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I could never understand weak cards in YuGiOh.
DragonClaw01 01/16/22 8:01:09 PM #34:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Two spell cards to make a monster that's weaker than a blue eyes and can be beat with trash tier traps. Plus you are sacrificing your whole deck for a card that is hardly even a win condition. If I was making that much of a commitment I would want a near guaranteed chance of victory. Disabling your opponent from attacking for a few turns in hardly a win condition & the card doesn't disable monster effects, spell cards & trap cards, so it is doubtful it would even last more than a turn or even be able to played in the first place. Even if you were playing some UU format, I don't see it being an effective build even if you just use it as a card to try to ramp. --- <('.'<) <(^.^)> (>'.')> Splendiferous <cite>DragonClaw01 posted [p:961806119] in I could ne... [t:79853832]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>Two spell cards to make a monster that's weaker than a blue eyes and can be beat with trash tier traps.</quote>Plus you are sacrificing your whole deck for a card that is hardly even a win condition. If I was making that much of a commitment I would want a near guaranteed chance of victory. Disabling your opponent from attacking for a few turns in hardly a win condition & the card doesn't disable monster effects, spell cards & trap cards, so it is doubtful it would even last more than a turn or even be able to played in the first place. Even if you were playing some UU format, I don't see it being an effective build even if you just use it as a card to try to ramp. --- <('.'<) <(^.^)> (>'.')> Splendiferous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1