LogFAQs > #960750637

Okay, so I watched the first like 20 minutes and then skipped around, but I'm just going to say right now what the problem seems to be almost immediately.

We can't see into your head. We can literally only respond to what you type. So when you say stuff like "You're reading too far into it" or "I don't even think X, I just said Y," that is context we cannot have. So when you say X dumb/offensive/insulting/whatever thing, and your next several replies just continue to be very flippant, dismissive, and so on, then yes, we're obviously going to read into X, because you never clarified that you didn't actually mean X until much later. That was a very constant theme throughout both arguments. You'd type X, you'd kinda ramble on in replies rather dismissively, and then you'd bounce. It's kinda like walking into a bar full of Philadelphia Eagles fans, saying out loud "Eagles are shit," not actually clarifying whatever you actually meant by that until sometime later, and then wondering why the rest of the people in the bar are pissed at you and keep bringing up the "shit" comment.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!