LogFAQs > #958982431

I interpreted 2 as a rehashing of the first, which is fine. It added cool chick to the cast. But she wasnt far off from the mother. They had a Chucky that capitalized on the strengths of the original, but was safer in terms of mechanical design.... as a result leaving the character much less visually obscene (and thus shocking) using the new techniques. The more youthful girl helps make up for this to a certain extent, but in the end .... its no Ghostbusters II, imo. Childs Play 3 was actually a really good movie lol. If it had its own monster. An evil teddy bear. Anything. It would have rocked. They could have done a sequel about the haunted fairgrounds, and done with childs play what halloween wanted, to explore more magic, monsters, and just other themes.