| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Arv doesn't agree with her body her choice |
| adjl 09/15/21 5:07:06 PM #27: | LinkPizza posted... Thats where we disagree. I think if hes involved and get to visit the kid and stuff, he should have to pay child support. Because hes involved Does any other person that's involved in the kid's life have to pay child support in exchange for that involvement? LinkPizza posted... And I dont think its silly. Big choices like this should come with bit consequences. That's completely arbitrary, though, and not altogether practical to enforce. You're literally suggesting a restraining order that the subject of the order (the child) doesn't agree to and can never override, for the sake of arbitrarily attaching major consequences to what's functionally nothing more than a custody decision. The infrastructure already exists to grant one parent sole custody without resorting to restraining orders (outside of extreme cases where the other parent really doesn't cope well with that decision, but that's in response to actual criminal harassment). There's no reason this system couldn't just follow that. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |