LogFAQs > #956658977

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Sega Saturn should have been 64-bit and come out in 1996.
Scotty_Rogers 07/31/21 11:34:06 PM #23:	limp-bizkit-89 posted... the n64 was by far the most powerful but it was a nightmare to develop for. Less cartridge space, couldn't do 2D games virtually at all and even a lot of 3D games looked off. Some devs even found the N64 worse to develop for Saturn ran on the superior CDs and was the king at 2D. All in all, I'd say their hardware was about equally bad, but the N64 had better marketing so it lasted longer. The main point is that the Saturn didn't need to have the best hardware; even if it was just passable, it would have done well if it was marketed better. --- Da GOAT Fam 2021! <cite>Scotty_Rogers posted [p:956658977] in The Sega S... [t:79590694]...</cite> <quote>limp-bizkit-89 posted... </cite> <quote>the n64 was by far the most powerful but it was a nightmare to develop for.</quote> Less cartridge space, couldn't do 2D games virtually at all and even a lot of 3D games looked off. Some devs even found the N64 worse to develop for Saturn ran on the superior CDs and was the king at 2D. All in all, I'd say their hardware was about equally bad, but the N64 had better marketing so it lasted longer. The main point is that the Saturn didn't need to have the best hardware; even if it was just passable, it would have done well if it was marketed better. --- Da GOAT Fam 2021!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1