LogFAQs > #956619071

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Sega Saturn should have been 64-bit and come out in 1996.
yutterh 07/30/21 5:10:02 PM #19:	DirkDiggles posted... If you are just going by raw power, then yeah, the 64 is more powerful. Graphic realism, sound, and programing go to the PS1. The competition really was CD vs Cartridge. CD's had more space and if the game wasn't big enough it was able to be split up into multiple discs. Which is why RPGs flourished on the PS compared to the N64. Though the N64 did technically have more power. --- CPU i5 10600k, CPUC evga CLC 280x140, RAM tridentz 3200mhz cl14 32gb, MOBO Asus Rog strix e-gaming, GPU evga fc3 rtx 3070, PSU evga 850w G2, Samsung G7 32in. <cite>yutterh posted [p:956619071] in The Sega S... [t:79590694]...</cite> <quote>DirkDiggles posted... </cite> <quote>If you are just going by raw power, then yeah, the 64 is more powerful. Graphic realism, sound, and programing go to the PS1.</quote> The competition really was CD vs Cartridge. CD's had more space and if the game wasn't big enough it was able to be split up into multiple discs. Which is why RPGs flourished on the PS compared to the N64. Though the N64 did technically have more power. --- CPU i5 10600k, CPUC evga CLC 280x140, RAM tridentz 3200mhz cl14 32gb, MOBO Asus Rog strix e-gaming, GPU evga fc3 rtx 3070, PSU evga 850w G2, Samsung G7 32in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1