| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | channing Tatum being in Kingsman 2 was pointless |
| helIy 07/27/21 9:31:43 AM #29: | lihlih posted... Wow, the fact that you didn't get the set up of Lancelot and setting up Eggsy to be able to handle himself in order to have him be capable of carrying a sequel either with Lancelot being an equal or a smaller sidekick character just went over your head. lancelot was in kingsman 2. and he did carry the sequel, he's literally the main character, and he does have a sidekick. i'm really not sure what you're bitching about. lihlih posted... I have watched some James Bond movies, yes. Not sure what that has anything to do with this, but I'm sure in your head it has everything to do with this because your head works differently from a normal human being's. because how james bond does sequels is the same way kingsman did its sequel, bruv. --- but i'm not the villain, despite what you're always preaching call me a traitor, i'm just collecting your victims ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |