LogFAQs > #956379292

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI'm an anti-natalist.
kind9
07/23/21 8:38:39 AM
#193:


Reigning_King posted...
There is a big difference in wanting to simply reduce the amount of human suffering in the world and wanting to eliminate it entirely.
What about what I said implies that I want to simply reduce suffering? I said "eliminate suffering as much as possible." In case you didn't know, quality of life has been on a steady incline for centuries. As science and technology improves, who knows what the future holds? I mean other than you with your power of omniscience to claim as an undeniable fact that human suffering will always exist.

Reigning_King posted...
I really don't get how you can call the reduction of human suffering noble but condemn the eradication of it.
What does it matter if you eliminate human suffering when there are no humans left to experience that blissful existence? I don't care about imaginary people in imaginary worlds. I care about extant humanity. When there are no humans left and the concept of "good" no longer has meaning or application, what good have you accomplished?

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1