LogFAQs > #956324058

ReturnOfFa posted...

Disagreeing with a position does not equal a failure to understand it. You're really starting to seem like Sunny.

It's hard to tell when most of the posts in this topic are just "you're wrong lmao!" without any elaboration or counter arguments presents, I'm looking for an honest and straightforward debate but no such thing has appeared.

ReturnOfFa posted...

I am not telling you to kill yourself, that is gross. I know it's a line I'm riding, but if you actually believed your 'philosophy', mass human extinction is the most effective way of achieving it. Why isn't mass human suicide part of your ideals when it clearly aligns with them?

You say stuff like this and then seriously want me to believe you don't fail to understand my position? I'll tell you outright that you're wrong. You've failed to understand that you don't even understand.

Absolutely no killing or suicide is necessary for a future without humanity, I have already given multiple other ways such a thing could be accomplished. They are unrealistic as I mentioned then but your "ideas" are even more so than mine. How on earth would everyone be convinced to commit suicide or how would a group go about killing all of humanity? Even launching all nukes we have across the earth wouldn't technically guarantee the destruction of humanity, not withstanding the technical infeasibility of such a plan.