LogFAQs > #956199898

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	DEMOCRAT says she was HORRIFIED to see a WOMAN with PENIS at an ASIAN SPA!!!
Sahuagin 07/18/21 2:22:29 AM #137:	good god adjl posted... So give me a reason. Demonstrate how/why nudity is not inherently morally neutral. to be clear, it's exposing someone to nudity against their will that is immoral. nudity in a vacuum is amoral without someone to view it. adjl posted... being weighed against the profound psychological benefit of accepting trans people as their target gender being weighed against? it doesn't even really have anything to do with trans. ideally a person should not be able to enter a situation where they will be exposed to male (or female) nudity against their will. adjl posted... So replace "transphobe" with "somebody that really doesn't like Spongebob." well if you're really stuck at "subjecting someone to nudity against their will is morally neutral" there's no sense arguing at a higher level. adjl posted... Saying "I think it's great that you're so obviously different from everyone else here! We're going to publicly announce that people that are so obviously different from everyone else here are still welcome here so that anyone that does have a problem with how obviously different you are knows not to come see how obviously different you are!" is not acceptance. so should I feel offended for having to use the mens' room and not the ladies' room? adjl posted... just a lady getting uppity because she's convinced herself that the problem here is that you are making yourself the arbiter of what other people should and shouldn't find... I want to say "offensive" but it doesn't even have to be that. the person in question here is pro-trans, but just didn't want to be around male nudity with her daughter. a person has a right to be able to choose to be around male nudity or not. the fact that you are basically arguing here that "there is no particular reason to warn people, including parents with young children, of the presence of male nudity" is frankly a little nauseating. (and actually it's worse than that, since you're demeaning the person on top of that.) I want to ask "is exposing yourself in public" at least wrong, but I guess I already did and you gave a non-answer. so are you really saying that it would not be wrong for random adults to go naked around elementary school age children that they don't know, for non-sexual reasons, and without the consent of the children or their parents? --- *The truth basks in scrutiny.* https://imgur.com/GMouTGs http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png <cite>Sahuagin posted [p:956199898] in DEMOCRAT s... [t:79558763]...</cite> <quote>good god adjl posted... </cite> <quote>So give me a reason. Demonstrate how/why nudity is not inherently morally neutral.</quote>to be clear, it's exposing someone to nudity against their will that is immoral. nudity in a vacuum is amoral without someone to view it. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>being weighed against the profound psychological benefit of accepting trans people as their target gender</quote>being weighed against? it doesn't even really have anything to do with trans. ideally a person should not be able to enter a situation where they will be exposed to male (or female) nudity against their will. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>So replace "transphobe" with "somebody that really doesn't like Spongebob."</quote>well if you're really stuck at "subjecting someone to nudity against their will is morally neutral" there's no sense arguing at a higher level. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Saying "I think it's great that you're so obviously different from everyone else here! We're going to publicly announce that people that are so obviously different from everyone else here are still welcome here so that anyone that does have a problem with how obviously different you are knows not to come see how obviously different you are!" is not acceptance.</quote>so should I feel offended for having to use the mens' room and not the ladies' room? adjl posted... </cite> <quote>just a lady getting uppity because she's convinced herself that</quote>the problem here is that you are making yourself the arbiter of what other people should and shouldn't find... I want to say "offensive" but it doesn't even have to be that. the person in question here is pro-trans, but just didn't want to be around male nudity with her daughter. a person has a right to be able to choose to be around male nudity or not. the fact that you are basically arguing here that "there is no particular reason to warn people, including parents with young children, of the presence of male nudity" is frankly a little nauseating. (and actually it's worse than that, since you're demeaning the person on top of that.) I want to ask "is exposing yourself in public" at least wrong, but I guess I already did and you gave a non-answer. so are you really saying that it would not be wrong for random adults to go naked around elementary school age children that they don't know, for non-sexual reasons, and without the consent of the children or their parents? --- The truth basks in scrutiny. https://imgur.com/GMouTGs http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1