LogFAQs > #954962313

daynlokki posted...

I mean the show literally says the definition is someone making a choice the sacred timeline doesnt want lol. Gamora made a choice that was a part of the timeline. How is that a variant to you again? You dont seem to understand this very, very basic concept. To be a variant you must do something that isnt a part of the sacred timeline. She did not. What she did was literally a major part OF the sacred timeline. Therefore, she cannot be a variant.

Variants allowed to roam create constant branches as seen by Loki 3.

Also, would point out they know everything that is supposed to happen. To the TVA, its all happening at the same time. Past and future are one. Ergo why time is different here is a thing. They showed Loki the future as to that version none of that had occurred. They can travel to any point in the timeline for branches.

The reason I am agreeing to disagree is because we see the fundamentals differently and there's no proof that there's branches that just happen and are not Nexus events. Every branch has to close. Every branch is a Nexus event because a Nexus event is the split itself. All splits are unnatural to a single timeline. Whether they temporarily allow you to proceed to achieve a goal farther in the timeline is a different story.

The Avengers were sanctioned. Even if they were to break any rules, they were allowed to and almost everything was returned to how it was except for Loki, Gamora and possibly Cap. Just like how Loki has been sanctioned now to meddle in the affairs of the main timeline.

So with that out of the way, what I'm saying is that anybody displaced from their timeline is a variant because splits only happen when a different choice is made from the original. And that's called a Nexus event. All per the cartoon. If you disagree with all this, that's fine.


---

"Fear cuts deeper than swords."