LogFAQs > #953865607

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Liz Cheney ousted from GOP leadership position for saying Biden won in 2020
darkknight109 05/13/21 1:57:35 PM #39:	Zeus posted... ...overlooking the fact that throughout Trump's presidency she had very frequently worked to undermine him and thus weaken her own party. By having a voting record that was one of the most loyal to Trump's agenda in all of the GOP? The woman being put forward as her replacement, by the by, voted against Trump frequently, including against his signature tax cuts. Zeus posted... (and it's worth noting that you, BS0, and others spent the last 4 years lying that those elections were fraudulent, despite the fact that the voting was overwhelmingly in person with stricter standards than the last election). No one suggested the 2016 elections were fraudulent. This is revisionist history from salty conservatives trying to "Same thing, both sides" some alternative facts to support their narrative. At best, the left suggested that the 2016 election was tainted by Russian interference (which it was, as Mueller's report explicitly proved) or was unfair because more people voted for Clinton and the EC is a moronic system that has been so far perverted from its original intended purpose that it effectively only exists as an anti-majoritarian method to allow one party to behave anti-democratically. No one, however, suggested that Trump did not actually win the states he won or get the requisite number of EC votes to become president. The left's argument was that the electoral system that placed Donald Trump in the presidency was undemocratic, not that the election itself was fraudulent. Not that I would expect you to understand the difference or acknowledge it long enough to realize it scuppers your narrative. Zeus posted... Cue laugh track Meanwhile Biden remains committed to overturning the second amendment through hook AND crook, limiting the first amendment, etc. Even pretending this was true for a second (it isn't), that still doesn't compare to the party that literally staged an insurrection to try and prevent the orderly procession of legitimate electoral results, which is the sort of banana republic shit you usually only see out of third world failed democratic states, rather than from a country that likes to pretend that it's the freest and most democratic nation in the world (a claim that proves more spurious by the year). --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:953865607] in Liz Cheney... [t:79455275]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>...overlooking the fact that throughout Trump's presidency she had very frequently worked to undermine him and thus weaken her own party.</quote>By having a voting record that was one of the most loyal to Trump's agenda in all of the GOP? The woman being put forward as her replacement, by the by, voted against Trump frequently, including against his signature tax cuts. Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>(and it's worth noting that you, BS0, and others spent the last 4 years lying that those elections were fraudulent, despite the fact that the voting was overwhelmingly in person with stricter standards than the last election).</quote>No one suggested the 2016 elections were fraudulent. This is revisionist history from salty conservatives trying to "Same thing, both sides" some alternative facts to support their narrative. At best, the left suggested that the 2016 election was tainted by Russian interference (which it was, as Mueller's report explicitly proved) or was unfair because more people voted for Clinton and the EC is a moronic system that has been so far perverted from its original intended purpose that it effectively only exists as an anti-majoritarian method to allow one party to behave anti-democratically. No one, however, suggested that Trump did not actually win the states he won or get the requisite number of EC votes to become president. The left's argument was that the electoral system that placed Donald Trump in the presidency was undemocratic, not that the election itself was fraudulent. Not that I would expect you to understand the difference or acknowledge it long enough to realize it scuppers your narrative. Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Cue laugh track Meanwhile Biden remains committed to overturning the second amendment through hook AND crook, limiting the first amendment, etc.</quote>Even pretending this was true for a second (it isn't), that still doesn't compare to the party that literally staged an insurrection to try and prevent the orderly procession of legitimate electoral results, which is the sort of banana republic shit you usually only see out of third world failed democratic states, rather than from a country that likes to pretend that it's the freest and most democratic nation in the world (a claim that proves more spurious by the year). --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1