LogFAQs > #953623180

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicChina heavily damaging the planet. More greenhouse gases.
uwnim
05/06/21 1:17:42 PM
#25:


polopili posted...
It's still the right way to interpret the data. I know it's cool to blame others for environmental problems, but the bottom line is that we are performing really badly at this and the Paris Agreement is going to be a total failure.
I disagree. We dont care about how many units of green house has emissions exist per person, we care about the total. It is extremely difficult if not impossible for people to reduce their own contributions by researching which product is better/worse for literally everything so a top down approach is more effective and from that perspective net totals are what matters.
Questionmarktarius posted...
unless energy and materials demands are met via some other means, probably nuclear
At least in the US, a big obstacle to that is our regulatory system that exists primarily to make nuclear more expensive.

---
I want a pet Lavos Spawn.
[Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica]
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1