LogFAQs > #953556802

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	DNA test from 1993 killing doesn't show man who was executed for it
Unsugarized_Foo 05/04/21 6:36:36 PM #29:	Zikten posted... Who decides what counts as absolutely without doubt? Jesus, basically Tyranthraxus posted... You still can't set bars like that because people have been executed in the past due to proven faked evidence and cop lies. So it looks like "guilty without doubt" to a jury but then it turns out the jury was fed a bunch of fucking lies. Yeah, which is why I dont like. Itd probably have to be self-defense or some scenario that doesn't go to court --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:953556802] in DNA test f... [t:79440812]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite> <quote>Who decides what counts as absolutely without doubt?</quote> Jesus, basically Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>You still can't set bars like that because people have been executed in the past due to proven faked evidence and cop lies. So it looks like "guilty without doubt" to a jury but then it turns out the jury was fed a bunch of fucking lies.</quote> Yeah, which is why I dont like. Itd probably have to be self-defense or some scenario that doesn't go to court --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1