LogFAQs > #953444939

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTom Holland vs Andrew Garfield vs Tobey Maguire
greatmonkeybaby
05/01/21 3:36:26 PM
#39:


FortuneCookie posted...
Andrew > Tom > Tobey

The Sam Raimi films had high production values, but Tobey Maguire was miscast. He was alright as Peter Parker, but he didn't feel like Spider-Man. He didn't have the cockiness down pat. It was like making a Muhammad Ali movie and not letting him trash talk.

Maybe Spider-Man was more humble in the 1960s when Sam Raimi was a kid, but that's ignoring several decades of development. I would say you might as well put Batman in blue but Hollywood did that too.

thats true I did enjoy Garfleids spidey humor and quotes a lot

Proto_Spark posted...
I think Garfield is underrated as Spider Man. The first one was great, and while Garfield could be "too cool" he still rocked the whole awkward outcast thing Peter Parker has.

Indeed very true!!!

Dakimakura posted...
Tobey Maguire is the only spider-man.

feelz

FortuneCookie posted...
Holland's Spider-Man is just business.

Disney doesn't own the movie rights lock, stock, and barrel, so they're trying to utilize Spider-Man's popularity while still positioning their own heroes to be cooler.

makes sense

MabusIncarnate posted...
he matches the character the best.

yeah thats true


---
Light Yagami: Dad, Write His Name! Use All The Strength You've Got Left And Write His Name!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1