LogFAQs > #953393598

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Tom Holland vs Andrew Garfield vs Tobey Maguire
greatmonkeybaby 04/30/21 4:00:56 AM #12:	Machete posted... 80s cartoon spiderman i didnt get to see that one but I heard great things about it actually so Im sure youre right ShyOx posted... I mean none of this would exist without Tobey doing it first. Batman movies were important but the last few were so bad people stopped making them. Superman movies got weird real fast and never really captured what the comics were about. Spiderman hit the mark waaaaay closer and had waaaaay larger profit margins. Movies didn't start making the CRAZY money until Spiderman, Lord of the Rings, and Titanic, and the latter two were super in depth expensive projects developing technology no one had ever seen. I suppose the star wars prequels go into that too THEN Disney started making insane, holy hell shit your pants money with their stuff. And now we're watching the film industry cannibalize itself tl;dr Tobey did it first and so should rightfully get credit for that, he's also a better actor by miles than the other two based on his other performances. hahaha I feel that SolidShadow3 posted... He can get all the credit in the world for doing it first, but that doesnt mean hes the best Peter Parker/Spider-Man. Although like I said, he was a perfect Peter, just missed the mark when it comes to Spider-Man. lol what about him as spider man didnt you like? --- Light Yagami: Dad, Write His Name! Use All The Strength You've Got Left And Write His Name! <cite>greatmonkeybaby posted [p:953393598] in Tom Hollan... [t:79433012]...</cite> <quote>Machete posted... </cite> <quote>80s cartoon spiderman</quote> i didnt get to see that one but I heard great things about it actually so Im sure youre right ShyOx posted... </cite> <quote>I mean none of this would exist without Tobey doing it first. Batman movies were important but the last few were so bad people stopped making them. Superman movies got weird real fast and never really captured what the comics were about. Spiderman hit the mark waaaaay closer and had waaaaay larger profit margins. Movies didn't start making the CRAZY money until Spiderman, Lord of the Rings, and Titanic, and the latter two were super in depth expensive projects developing technology no one had ever seen. I suppose the star wars prequels go into that too THEN Disney started making insane, holy hell shit your pants money with their stuff. And now we're watching the film industry cannibalize itself tl;dr Tobey did it first and so should rightfully get credit for that, he's also a better actor by miles than the other two based on his other performances.</quote> hahaha I feel that SolidShadow3 posted... </cite> <quote>He can get all the credit in the world for doing it first, but that doesnt mean hes the best Peter Parker/Spider-Man. Although like I said, he was a perfect Peter, just missed the mark when it comes to Spider-Man.</quote> lol what about him as spider man didnt you like? --- Light Yagami: Dad, Write His Name! Use All The Strength You've Got Left And Write His Name!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1