LogFAQs > #953393497

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTom Holland vs Andrew Garfield vs Tobey Maguire
ShyOx
04/30/21 3:54:09 AM
#8:


I mean none of this would exist without Tobey doing it first. Batman movies were important but the last few were so bad people stopped making them. Superman movies got weird real fast and never really captured what the comics were about.

Spiderman hit the mark waaaaay closer and had waaaaay larger profit margins. Movies didn't start making the CRAZY money until Spiderman, Lord of the Rings, and Titanic, and the latter two were super in depth expensive projects developing technology no one had ever seen. I suppose the star wars prequels go into that too

THEN

Disney started making insane, holy hell shit your pants money with their stuff. And now we're watching the film industry cannibalize itself

tl;dr Tobey did it first and so should rightfully get credit for that, he's also a better actor by miles than the other two based on his other performances.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1