LogFAQs > #952639402

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So why wasn't prince philip, king philip?
JE19426 04/09/21 10:35:22 AM #9:	He's "Prince Philip" and not "King Philip" as "King" isn't a title given by marriage. There's no "King Consort" while there is a "Queen Consort". He also isn't legally "Prince Consort" in the UK that's only been the title of Prince Consort Albert given to him by Queen Victoria. He was originally a Prince of Greece, but lost that title when Greece abolished the monarchy in the 1970's. He was given the title "Prince of the United Kingdom" back in the 1950's. <cite>JE19426 posted [p:952639402] in So why was... [t:79396167]...</cite> <quote>He's "Prince Philip" and not "King Philip" as "King" isn't a title given by marriage. There's no "King Consort" while there is a "Queen Consort". He also isn't legally "Prince Consort" in the UK that's only been the title of Prince Consort Albert given to him by Queen Victoria. He was originally a Prince of Greece, but lost that title when Greece abolished the monarchy in the 1970's. He was given the title "Prince of the United Kingdom" back in the 1950's. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1