LogFAQs > #952145087

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Republicans are literally calling for litarcy test for voting.
CyricZ 03/26/21 3:18:21 PM #26:	Trumble posted... So do you feel the voting age should be higher, or lower? 16, but I'd be willing to go as low as 13. What magically makes people "ready" at that age, more so than being actually informed would? Nothing. That's the point. Restriction of voting was only ever done to remove people considered "unworthy" of voting. Once you start to view people as unworthy of being part of the process, you start making excuses. --- CyricZ He/him <cite>CyricZ posted [p:952145087] in Republican... [t:79370263]...</cite> <quote>Trumble posted... </cite> <quote>So do you feel the voting age should be higher, or lower?</quote>16, but I'd be willing to go as low as 13. <quote>What magically makes people "ready" at that age, more so than being actually informed would?</quote>Nothing. That's the point. Restriction of voting was only ever done to remove people considered "unworthy" of voting. Once you start to view people as unworthy of being part of the process, you start making excuses. --- CyricZ He/him</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1