LogFAQs > #949767956

No. Youre not. You refusing to buy it is not locked out. Youre not using the correct words. You can literally buy it, but it cost kore than youre willing to spend. Youre literally not locked out of it. I have the game, too. And if I buy this version, I can play it. You can, too. If you buy the game, you can literally play it. So, youre not locked out...

I can't buy a game at $60 for $10 of content. If I let game companies screw me and buy a game that I already own at $60, then it means that I am perfectly happy with incomplete games, because game devs will never stop re-releasing the same game an infinite amount of times to fuck over the people who want everything. If Nintendo gets away with this then it is only a time before everyone else does the same and make you buy the same game an infinite amount of times to get all the content and ruin my life. So yes, it is locked out for me because I don't eat shit unlike other people who will gladly spend all their savings on videogames because they think it is perfectly fine for game devs to sell the same game an infinite amount of times for people who want a complete product. Not being able to play Bowser's Fury isn't the problem, it's gamers defending this and making sure you can never buy a game and own it that is the problem.

As for their fault, the only thing theyre at fault for is giving many players who didnt get the game or a Wii U a chance to play this game with some bonus stuff, as well. They would rather make a ton of fans happy rather than make only you happy. And its make sense not only financially, but makes them a good game company, as well. Since more people can experience the game... Buy releasing the game on a more popular system, they are giving the customers what they want. No re-releasing it would be considered screwing over the customers to some people, tbh... You are literally the only person Ive seen complain about them releasing remakes or remasters. Most people are usually happy. You just seem salty for no real reason...

A good game company always delivers and is consistent with the quality of their products. Wii U was a shit console with no exclusives so that makes Nintendo a trash company. And if I buy a $60 game, I should get all the bonus without buying it again, ever. I'm not letting any game dev fuck with me to make casuals happy.

An entire game (or more) is a whole lot more content than you're pissing yourself over here. I'm far more bothered by MP Trilogy releasing a mere two years after I paid the same price for MP3 alone than I am by SM3DW releasing with a few extra levels 7 years later.

If you bought MP3 at launch, you were screwed, but you didn't miss out on anything. If you bought Super Mario 3D World at launch, you are missing important content that you can only get if you bend down and let Nintendo know that you're happy with the Deluxe port scam where you have to buy a game a possibly infinite amount of times to get all the content.

Sonic Adventure 2 was ported to the GC (with extra content) 8 months after it came out on the Dreamcast. PSO was ported to GC 13 months after the release of v2, with all of Episode 2 added to it (plus some pretty substantial balance tweaks, including increasing some drop rates from literally millionths of a percent to merely 1/50,000), then again to Xbox 6 months after that. You had a hard enough sell for the "Nintendo standards" part, given how many examples I've already given to show precedent for remake windows like this, but bringing in "Sega standards" is just laughable.

Dreamcast had more exclusives by the time its generation ended than Wii U. That makes Wii U not even up to Dreamcast standards.

The WiiU's exclusives were exclusive for the system's lifetime. That's all you can reasonably expect of exclusives, given that the whole point of their exclusivity is to sell the system. Once the system is no longer selling, exclusivity stops mattering. There is nothing to be gained - for anyone - by keeping games tied down to systems that people can only find on Ebay and Craigslist.

Sure there is something to be gained by keeping games tied down to old systems: it is a reward for people who bought that console and protects the legacy of the console maker. If you make a failed console, then you must make sure it has enough exclusives to stand up to Dreamcast and Gamecube or otherwise you are a shit console maker.

So the PS5 version offers nothing the much-cheaper PS3 version doesn't. Sounds like a great reason to buy a whole console.

People buy the PS5 because of future games. Sony will guarantee that the console will be worth the investment, unlike Nintendo.

You bought them to play them and enjoy them. Which you did. I don't know why you're expecting more than that, and I especially don't know why you're acting like you got nothing when you got exactly what you intended to get.

I bought a Wii U because Nintendo exclusives were never exclusive just for the system's lifetime. That was the only reason I bought one. And Nintendo failed to even do the bare minimum I expected of them. Even with Virtual Boy, all of its games are still exclusive.